Use of iPads in schools Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Use of iPads in schools - Research Paper Example This document sets out to explore the major opposing views of implementing the iPad technology into academic learning. Most schools across the country are still finding or rather struggling to find just how new technological developments might educate students in a better way. Recent research shows that in thirty one US states, approximately 275,000 K-12 students were taking online classes (Valstad, 2011). Administrators of different schools are handing out iPads and encouraging students and teachers to find new and better ways in which they can use these gadgets to learn. Whereas the issuance of individual iPads to students and teachers is highly present in high-income earning students, those on the other end have a disadvantage in terms of access and use of the gadget. As much as many may be saying the technology-driven learning eases the whole learning process, making it more streamlined and efficient; a close attention needs to be paid with respect to the negative impacts associated with the use of this education-driven technology in school. One Matt Burns believes that iPads should not be in classrooms due to the fear of them turning into another prop for current scholars just in the same way calculators have made sure that children or rather students actually no longer need to know how to do mathematics (Henderson and Yeow, 2012). According to Valstad (2011), kids in the temporary classes are now taught to pass tests. Knowledge is externalized, stored on some server or gadget up to when they are needed. Despite the learning process being prevale nt in schools, the storage of thoughts and facts is not. iPads and their digital textbooks will only serve to further this problem as all it takes is a click on a word to get its meaning and or definition. In addition, Henderson and Yeow (2012) mention that students in classrooms are likely to suffer from potential distraction where

Construction Contract Law Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Construction Contract Law - Case Study Example These set of laws preside over the operation of government and safeguards the rights of individuals. As such, it is the very system of a well organised society. This essay will examine the importance of Alternative Dispute Resolution in resolving and expediting cases between and among the parties. In order to shed light to this, the case of Burchell v. Mr. and Mrs. Bullard will be used along with relevant provisions of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act of 1996, The Woolf Report, Pre-Action Protocol for the Construction and Engineering Disputes and other current and relevant materials to Alternative Dispute Resolution and Construction Contract Law. Among the difficulties encountered in forming this paper was that due to the relatively new case of Burchell, materials used for this paper are limited to current case laws and articles which relates to the case. In the instant case, Mr Burchell, the claimant, had agreed to build two large extensions to the home of Mr and Mrs Bullard, the defendants, for which he was to be paid in four stages, as stated in their agreement. The Spouses Bullard refused to make the third stage payment, amounting to 13,540.99 and find fault about the work that had been done. The claimant's solicitors initially wrote to the defendants suggesting that the matter be referred for an Alternative Dispute Resolution through "a qualified construction mediator". Subsequently, this approach was discarded by the defendant's surveyor on the grounds that the matters complained of are technically complex, and as such mediation is inappropriate to settle the issue in the case. The claimant claimed 18,318.45. The defendants responded by counterclaiming 100,815.34 and further damages which were then not fully particularised. The claimant then brought a Part 20 claim against a sub-contractor in relation to the roofing works. There were no payments into Court and no Part 36 Offers made. At first instance the Court rendered judgment in favour of the claimant on his claim and awarded him 18,327.04 but likewise gave judgment in favour of the defendants on the counterclaim in the amount of 14,373.15. The result was that the defendants had to pay the claimant the difference, which with interest and VAT came to only 5,025.63. The claimant was awarded 79.50 on his counterclaim against the sub-contractor. The defendants were ordered to pay the claimant's costs of the claim and in turn, the claimant was ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the counterclaim. The claimant was also ordered to pay the Part 20 defendant's costs on the basis that the Part 20 defendant had only had 79.50 awarded against him and had made offers to settle from the beginning. The claimant appealed the costs award and made a further proposal for mediation, requesting the defendants to submit to the Court of Appeal scheme. The defendants, thereafter responded in the negative stating that they did not consider that this would be either "necessary or appropriate". In determining whether the circumstances of the case justified a departure from the general